I like to think about things. I also like to question things – sometimes just for the sake of it.
I nerd myself into some things. Other things I am extremely uninterested in.
I have also become a climate change aunt, despite mine so far, in the context, young age.
On this blog you can read most of what fits in my world of thought. From social criticism to beauty 40+ to embarrassing stories to…
Welcome! 🙂
For those who do not know, I have worked as a photographer in portraits and weddings. I also have a handful of points in art history with a focus on photography – theory and method, mainly, which means image analysis. Very nerdy and very funny (for the nerd, in other words).
When I started reading the D-course in art history, I wanted to write my D-thesis on just this – the truth content in photography. Unfortunately, it did not happen – my supervisor thought the topic was too big, and besides, I started to get so bad in my bipolar disorder that I had to drop out of school. Unfortunately, there have not been more students since then.
Men – I have never let go of the thought of just this. In addition to my interest in photography, I am also very interested in philosophy, and the very question of truth in photography is in my eyes very interdisciplinary. Ever since the released D-course and D-thesis in art history, I have thought that I still want to write something about this.
And my God, as many times as I thought it was time to start. I think so now too. But it's not at all carved in stone that I get my ass out and actually write something together this time. But I hope so, because in my eyes it would be a really fun book. In addition, a book with many uses, not just for photography students or photography enthusiasts.
One for me The very clear purpose of a book like this is to spread knowledge and understanding about how we interpret photographs, and why. The realization that what we see in a photograph is not necessarily true and why is very important in our understanding of the photographs we encounter every day. We perceive, understand and interpret everything based on everything we know, can, believe us to know and be able to, our sympathy and empathy and so on, but it does not necessarily mean that what we perceive and understand is actually that way.
I have devoted a good while to think a little about the structure of a book like this. I have nothing finished so far, but have so slowly begun to make a mental inventory of books I want to use as references. It will, believe it or not, not just to become art history literature – but large parts of it, and.
I'm not thinking write more than that right now. Partly because I do not know yet if it will actually happen, partly because I'm about to go to sleep. But keep your fingers crossed, and feel free to tease me if you are curious. Thanks in advance. ♥